DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mitsubishi Colt vs 2004 Ford Fusion Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Colt

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
ColtModelFusion
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
190 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
109 HPPower90 HP
145 NmTorque204 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
47 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption5,5 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

3870 mmLength4020 mm
1695 mmWidth1708 mm
1550 mmHeight1503 mm
990 KgWeight1105 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2488 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mitsubishi Colt and 2004 Ford Fusion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Colt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…