DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 2000 Ford Galaxy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Carisma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
CarismaModelGalaxy
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

13,2 s0–100 km/h17,1 s
180 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
176 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
8 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
—Average consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/65R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4445 mmLength4641 mm
1710 mmWidth1810 mm
1405 mmHeight1732 mm
1145 KgWeight1670 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Carisma and 2000 Ford Galaxy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Carisma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…