2000 • Ford
Galaxy
Ford Galaxy 1.9 TDI (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score49.25/100
2000 Ford Galaxy vs 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Carisma
Mitsubishi Carisma 1.9 TD (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Carisma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford GalaxySpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
FordMakeMitsubishi
GalaxyModelCarisma
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford GalaxySpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
17,1 s0–100 km/h13,2 s
160 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
210 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford GalaxySpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption8 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford GalaxySpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford GalaxySpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
4641 mmLength4445 mm
1810 mmWidth1710 mm
1732 mmHeight1405 mm
1670 KgWeight1145 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Galaxy and 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Carisma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…