2000 • Daewoo
Rezzo
Daewoo Rezzo 1.8 i (101 Hp) 2000Overall Score51.25/100
2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Carisma
Mitsubishi Carisma 1.9 TD (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Daewoo Rezzo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
DaewooMakeMitsubishi
RezzoModelCarisma
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
12,0 s0–100 km/h13,2 s
170 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
101 HPPower90 HP
146 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption8 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
4350 mmLength4445 mm
1755 mmWidth1710 mm
1580 mmHeight1405 mm
1230 KgWeight1145 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Daewoo Rezzo and 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Rezzo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…