2016 • Mini
Paceman
Mini Paceman 1.6 (112 Hp) 2016Overall Score62.25/100
2016 Mini Paceman vs 2016 Honda FIT Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Honda
FIT
Honda FIT 1.5 (137 Hp) 2016Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Mini Paceman
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mini PacemanSpecificationHonda FIT
MiniMakeHonda
PacemanModelFIT
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Mini PacemanSpecificationHonda FIT
10,8 s0–100 km/h—
188 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
112 HPPower110 HP
270 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mini PacemanSpecificationHonda FIT
DieselFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
47 ltFuel tank32 lt
4,7 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mini PacemanSpecificationHonda FIT
4109 mmLength3955 mm
1786 mmWidth1695 mm
1518 mmHeight1525 mm
1310 KgWeight1080 Kg
2596 mmWheelbase2530 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Mini Paceman and 2016 Honda FIT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mini Paceman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…