2016 • Ford
Figo
Ford Figo 1.5 Ti-VCT (112 Hp) 2016Overall Score61.5/100
2016 Ford Figo vs 2016 Mini Paceman Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Mini
Paceman
Mini Paceman 1.6 (112 Hp) 2016Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Mini Paceman
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FigoSpecificationMini Paceman
FordMakeMini
FigoModelPaceman
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
4Doors3
Performance
Ford FigoSpecificationMini Paceman
—0–100 km/h10,8 s
0 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
112 HPPower112 HP
136 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FigoSpecificationMini Paceman
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption4,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FigoSpecificationMini Paceman
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
175/65 R14Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FigoSpecificationMini Paceman
3995 mmLength4109 mm
1695 mmWidth1786 mm
1525 mmHeight1518 mm
—Weight1310 Kg
2491 mmWheelbase2596 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Figo and 2016 Mini Paceman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mini Paceman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…