DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Honda FIT vs 2016 Mini Paceman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Paceman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeMini
FITModelPaceman
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,8 s
0 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
110 HPPower112 HP
134 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
32 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption4,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—Tyre size205/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3955 mmLength4109 mm
1695 mmWidth1786 mm
1525 mmHeight1518 mm
1080 KgWeight1310 Kg
2530 mmWheelbase2596 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Honda FIT and 2016 Mini Paceman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Paceman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…