DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mini Paceman vs 2016 Ford Figo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Paceman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeFord
PacemanModelFigo
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSedan
4Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h—
188 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
112 HPPower112 HP
270 NmTorque136 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank42 lt
4,7 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4109 mmLength3995 mm
1786 mmWidth1695 mm
1518 mmHeight1525 mm
1310 KgWeight—
2596 mmWheelbase2491 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mini Paceman and 2016 Ford Figo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Paceman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…