DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mini Convertible vs 2010 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

53.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeVolvo
ConvertibleModelV50
2010Model year2010
CabrioletBody typeEstate
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

11,3 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
181 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
98 HPPower100 HP
153 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
175/65 R15 84HTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3699 mmLength4522 mm
1683 mmWidth1845 mm
1414 mmHeight1457 mm
1160 KgWeight1335 Kg
2467 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mini Convertible and 2010 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…