2010 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 16V (100 Hp) 2010Overall Score54.25/100
2010 Ford C-Max vs 2010 Mini Convertible Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Mini
Convertible
Mini Convertible 1.6 (98 Hp) 2010Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMini Convertible
FordMakeMini
C-MaxModelConvertible
2010Model year2010
MPVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMini Convertible
12,9 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
175 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
100 HPPower98 HP
143 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMini Convertible
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank40 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption7,3 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMini Convertible
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size175/65 R15 84H
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMini Convertible
4372 mmLength3699 mm
1825 mmWidth1683 mm
1595 mmHeight1414 mm
1344 KgWeight1160 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2467 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Ford C-Max and 2010 Mini Convertible approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…