DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volvo V50 vs 2010 Mini Convertible Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

53.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeMini
V50ModelConvertible
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
0 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
100 HPPower98 HP
150 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank40 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption7,3 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size175/65 R15 84H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4522 mmLength3699 mm
1845 mmWidth1683 mm
1457 mmHeight1414 mm
1335 KgWeight1160 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2467 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volvo V50 and 2010 Mini Convertible approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…