DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mini Convertible vs 2010 Mazda 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeMazda
ConvertibleModel2
2010Model year2010
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

11,3 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
181 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
98 HPPower103 HP
153 NmTorque137 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank43 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
175/65 R15 84HTyre size195/45 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3699 mmLength3900 mm
1683 mmWidth1695 mm
1414 mmHeight1475 mm
1160 KgWeight960 Kg
2467 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mini Convertible and 2010 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…