DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG ZT vs 2005 Buick Lucerne Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZTSpecificationBuick Lucerne
MGMakeBuick
ZTModelLucerne
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeSedan
4Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

MG ZTSpecificationBuick Lucerne
6,5 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4565 cc
260 HPPower279 HP
410 NmTorque407 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZTSpecificationBuick Lucerne
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
17,9 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
10,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
13,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZTSpecificationBuick Lucerne
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
245/40 R18; 275/35 R18Tyre size245/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZTSpecificationBuick Lucerne
4740 mmLength5182 mm
1780 mmWidth1880 mm
1430 mmHeight1473 mm
1595 KgWeight1855 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2934 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG ZT and 2005 Buick Lucerne approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…