DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Toyota 4runner vs 2004 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Toyota 4runnerSpecificationMG ZT
ToyotaMakeMG
4runnerModelZT
2005Model year2004
SUVBody typeSedan
5/7Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

Toyota 4runnerSpecificationMG ZT
—0–100 km/h6,5 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4664 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
260 HPPower260 HP
414 NmTorque410 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Toyota 4runnerSpecificationMG ZT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
87 ltFuel tank65 lt
15,6 ltUrban consumption17,9 lt
12,3 ltExtra-urban consumption10,4 lt
—Average consumption13,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Toyota 4runnerSpecificationMG ZT
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
265/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size245/40 R18; 275/35 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Toyota 4runnerSpecificationMG ZT
4805 mmLength4740 mm
1910 mmWidth1780 mm
1760-1805 mmHeight1430 mm
2043 KgWeight1595 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Toyota 4runner and 2004 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…