DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Land Rover Discovery vs 2004 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.5–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMG
DiscoveryModelZT
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
7Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h6,5 s
195 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4394 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
295 HPPower260 HP
425 NmTorque410 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
86 ltFuel tank65 lt
20,9 ltUrban consumption17,9 lt
11,6 ltExtra-urban consumption10,4 lt
15 ltAverage consumption13,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
255/55 R19Tyre size245/40 R18; 275/35 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4835 mmLength4740 mm
2009 mmWidth1780 mm
1887 mmHeight1430 mm
2536 KgWeight1595 Kg
2885 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Land Rover Discovery and 2004 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…