DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG ZT vs 2005 Toyota 4runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZTSpecificationToyota 4runner
MGMakeToyota
ZTModel4runner
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeSUV
4Seats5/7
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZTSpecificationToyota 4runner
6,5 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4664 cc
260 HPPower260 HP
410 NmTorque414 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZTSpecificationToyota 4runner
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank87 lt
17,9 ltUrban consumption15,6 lt
10,4 ltExtra-urban consumption12,3 lt
13,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZTSpecificationToyota 4runner
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
245/40 R18; 275/35 R18Tyre size265/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZTSpecificationToyota 4runner
4740 mmLength4805 mm
1780 mmWidth1910 mm
1430 mmHeight1760-1805 mm
1595 KgWeight2043 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG ZT and 2005 Toyota 4runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…