DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG ZT vs 2005 Dodge RAM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZTSpecificationDodge RAM
MGMakeDodge
ZTModelRAM
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typePick-up
4Seats6
4Doors4

Performance

MG ZTSpecificationDodge RAM
6,5 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4701 cc
260 HPPower238 HP
410 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZTSpecificationDodge RAM
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank0 lt
17,9 ltUrban consumption—
10,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
13,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZTSpecificationDodge RAM
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
245/40 R18; 275/35 R18Tyre size265/70 R17; 245/70 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZTSpecificationDodge RAM
4740 mmLength5834 mm
1780 mmWidth2019 mm
1430 mmHeight1880 mm
1595 KgWeight—
2750 mmWheelbase3569 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG ZT and 2005 Dodge RAM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…