DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZT vs 2003 Dodge Magnum Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZTSpecificationDodge Magnum
MGMakeDodge
ZTModelMagnum
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZTSpecificationDodge Magnum
9,4 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
215 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2736 cc
177 HPPower193 HP
240 NmTorque258 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZTSpecificationDodge Magnum
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank68 lt
16 ltUrban consumption15 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZTSpecificationDodge Magnum
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/45 R18Tyre size225/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZTSpecificationDodge Magnum
4740 mmLength5020 mm
1780 mmWidth1880 mm
1410 mmHeight1505 mm
1510 KgWeight1725 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase3050 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZT and 2003 Dodge Magnum approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…