DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Dodge Magnum vs 2003 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Dodge MagnumSpecificationMG ZT
DodgeMakeMG
MagnumModelZT
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Dodge MagnumSpecificationMG ZT
10,7 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
190 km/hTop speed215 km/h
2736 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
193 HPPower177 HP
258 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Dodge MagnumSpecificationMG ZT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank65 lt
15 ltUrban consumption16 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt
—Average consumption10,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Dodge MagnumSpecificationMG ZT
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/60 R18Tyre size225/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Dodge MagnumSpecificationMG ZT
5020 mmLength4740 mm
1880 mmWidth1780 mm
1505 mmHeight1410 mm
1725 KgWeight1510 Kg
3050 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Dodge Magnum and 2003 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…