DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Jeep Cherokee vs 2003 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jeep CherokeeSpecificationMG ZT
JeepMakeMG
CherokeeModelZT
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Jeep CherokeeSpecificationMG ZT
—0–100 km/h9,4 s
167 km/hTop speed215 km/h
2429 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
147 HPPower177 HP
215 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Jeep CherokeeSpecificationMG ZT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
16,4 ltUrban consumption16 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption10,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jeep CherokeeSpecificationMG ZT
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size225/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jeep CherokeeSpecificationMG ZT
4496 mmLength4740 mm
1819 mmWidth1780 mm
1866 mmHeight1410 mm
1803 KgWeight1510 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Jeep Cherokee and 2003 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…