DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZT vs 2003 Toyota Celica Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZTSpecificationToyota Celica
MGMakeToyota
ZTModelCelica
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

MG ZTSpecificationToyota Celica
11,6 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
195 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1794 cc
160 HPPower143 HP
215 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZTSpecificationToyota Celica
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption10,3 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZTSpecificationToyota Celica
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/50 R17Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZTSpecificationToyota Celica
4740 mmLength4335 mm
1780 mmWidth1735 mm
1410 mmHeight1320 mm
1440 KgWeight1070 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZT and 2003 Toyota Celica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…