DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda Roadster vs 2003 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda RoadsterSpecificationMG ZT
MazdaMakeMG
RoadsterModelZT
2003Model year2003
RoadsterBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Mazda RoadsterSpecificationMG ZT
—0–100 km/h11,6 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
146 HPPower160 HP
168 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda RoadsterSpecificationMG ZT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption11,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
—Average consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda RoadsterSpecificationMG ZT
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size215/50 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda RoadsterSpecificationMG ZT
3955 mmLength4740 mm
1680 mmWidth1780 mm
1235 mmHeight1410 mm
1010 KgWeight1440 Kg
2265 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda Roadster and 2003 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…