DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda MX-5 vs 2003 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MX-5SpecificationMG ZT
MazdaMakeMG
MX-5ModelZT
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Mazda MX-5SpecificationMG ZT
8,4 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
208 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
146 HPPower160 HP
168 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MX-5SpecificationMG ZT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MX-5SpecificationMG ZT
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15 84 V; 205/45 ZR16 83 WTyre size215/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MX-5SpecificationMG ZT
3975 mmLength4740 mm
1680 mmWidth1780 mm
1220 mmHeight1410 mm
1065 KgWeight1440 Kg
2265 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda MX-5 and 2003 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…