DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZT vs 2003 Seat Leon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZTSpecificationSeat Leon
MGMakeSeat
ZTModelLeon
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZTSpecificationSeat Leon
11,6 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
195 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1900 cc
160 HPPower150 HP
215 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZTSpecificationSeat Leon
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,8 ltAverage consumption5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZTSpecificationSeat Leon
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
215/50 R17Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

MG ZTSpecificationSeat Leon
4740 mmLength—
1780 mmWidth—
1410 mmHeight—
1440 KgWeight—
2746 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZT and 2003 Seat Leon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…