DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZT vs 2003 Mazda Roadster Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZTSpecificationMazda Roadster
MGMakeMazda
ZTModelRoadster
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

MG ZTSpecificationMazda Roadster
11,6 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
160 HPPower146 HP
215 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZTSpecificationMazda Roadster
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank48 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZTSpecificationMazda Roadster
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/50 R17Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

MG ZTSpecificationMazda Roadster
4740 mmLength3955 mm
1780 mmWidth1680 mm
1410 mmHeight1235 mm
1440 KgWeight1010 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2265 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZT and 2003 Mazda Roadster approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…