DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZT vs 2003 Mazda Protege Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZTSpecificationMazda Protege
MGMakeMazda
ZTModelProtege
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZTSpecificationMazda Protege
11,6 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1845 cc
160 HPPower135 HP
215 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZTSpecificationMazda Protege
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZTSpecificationMazda Protege
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
215/50 R17Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

MG ZTSpecificationMazda Protege
4740 mmLength4200 mm
1780 mmWidth1695 mm
1410 mmHeight1420 mm
1440 KgWeight—
2746 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZT and 2003 Mazda Protege approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…