DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZT vs 2003 Fiat Stilo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZTSpecificationFiat Stilo
MGMakeFiat
ZTModelStilo
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

MG ZTSpecificationFiat Stilo
11,6 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
195 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1747 cc
160 HPPower133 HP
215 NmTorque162 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZTSpecificationFiat Stilo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank58 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption11,3 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZTSpecificationFiat Stilo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/50 R17Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZTSpecificationFiat Stilo
4740 mmLength4180 mm
1780 mmWidth1785 mm
1410 mmHeight1475 mm
1440 KgWeight1240 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZT and 2003 Fiat Stilo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…