DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG TF vs 2004 Skoda Fabia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG TF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG TFSpecificationSkoda Fabia
MGMakeSkoda
TFModelFabia
2004Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

MG TFSpecificationSkoda Fabia
10,2 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
190 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
120 HPPower98 HP
160 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG TFSpecificationSkoda Fabia
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG TFSpecificationSkoda Fabia
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
185/55 R15; 205/50 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG TFSpecificationSkoda Fabia
3943 mmLength3960 mm
1630 mmWidth1645 mm
1261 mmHeight1450 mm
1125 KgWeight1155 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2462 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG TF and 2004 Skoda Fabia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG TF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…