DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 2004 MG TF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG TF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationMG TF
Alfa RomeoMakeMG
156ModelTF
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationMG TF
10,5 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
200 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
146 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationMG TF
PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationMG TF
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears—
185/65 R15Tyre size185/55 R15; 205/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationMG TF
4435 mmLength3943 mm
1743 mmWidth1630 mm
1430 mmHeight1261 mm
1265 KgWeight1125 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2375 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2004 MG TF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG TF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…