DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG ZS vs 2004 MG TF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG TF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationMG TF
MGMakeMG
ZSModelTF
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationMG TF
9,0 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
19 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
117 HPPower120 HP
160 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationMG TF
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationMG TF
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears—
205/45 R17Tyre size185/55 R15; 205/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationMG TF
4520 mmLength3943 mm
1700 mmWidth1630 mm
1390 mmHeight1261 mm
1125 KgWeight1125 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2375 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG ZS and 2004 MG TF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG TF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…