DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG TF vs 2004 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG TF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG TFSpecificationMG ZS
MGMakeMG
TFModelZS
2004Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

MG TFSpecificationMG ZS
10,2 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
190 km/hTop speed19 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
120 HPPower117 HP
160 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG TFSpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG TFSpecificationMG ZS
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
185/55 R15; 205/50 R15Tyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG TFSpecificationMG ZS
3943 mmLength4520 mm
1630 mmWidth1700 mm
1261 mmHeight1390 mm
1125 KgWeight1125 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG TF and 2004 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG TF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…