DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG TF vs 2003 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG TFSpecificationKia Optima
MGMakeKia
TFModelOptima
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

MG TFSpecificationKia Optima
7,6 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed199 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1836 cc
160 HPPower134 HP
174 NmTorque169 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG TFSpecificationKia Optima
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank65 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG TFSpecificationKia Optima
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/45 R16; 215/40 R16Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG TFSpecificationKia Optima
3943 mmLength4745 mm
1630 mmWidth1815 mm
1261 mmHeight1420 mm
1115 KgWeight1390 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG TF and 2003 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…