DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Toyota Vista vs 2003 MG TF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Vista

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Toyota VistaSpecificationMG TF
ToyotaMakeMG
VistaModelTF
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

Toyota VistaSpecificationMG TF
—0–100 km/h7,6 s
180 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1794 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
136 HPPower160 HP
171 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Toyota VistaSpecificationMG TF
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
11 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Toyota VistaSpecificationMG TF
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size195/45 R16; 215/40 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Toyota VistaSpecificationMG TF
4670 mmLength3943 mm
1695 mmWidth1630 mm
1510 mmHeight1261 mm
1210 KgWeight1115 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2375 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Toyota Vista and 2003 MG TF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Vista leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…