DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Toyota Opa vs 2003 MG TF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Opa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Toyota OpaSpecificationMG TF
ToyotaMakeMG
OpaModelTF
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

Toyota OpaSpecificationMG TF
—0–100 km/h7,6 s
190 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1794 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
136 HPPower160 HP
171 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Toyota OpaSpecificationMG TF
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
12 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Toyota OpaSpecificationMG TF
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/45 R16; 215/40 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Toyota OpaSpecificationMG TF
4250 mmLength3943 mm
1695 mmWidth1630 mm
1530 mmHeight1261 mm
1210 KgWeight1115 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2375 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Toyota Opa and 2003 MG TF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Opa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…