DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mercury Tracer vs 2000 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Tracer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeLand Rover
TracerModelFreelander
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h14,4 s
185 km/hTop speed159 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1950 cc
111 HPPower112 HP
170 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/80 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4440 mmLength4368 mm
1700 mmWidth1809 mm
1350 mmHeight1708 mm
1115 KgWeight1565 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mercury Tracer and 2000 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Tracer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…