DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs 2000 Mercury Tracer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Tracer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeMercury
Grand VitaraModelTracer
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
—Seats5
—Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
109 HPPower111 HP
250 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank48 lt
—Urban consumption8,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size185/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4440 mm
—Width1700 mm
—Height1350 mm
—Weight1115 Kg
—Wheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Suzuki Grand Vitara and 2000 Mercury Tracer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Tracer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…