DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Freelander vs 2000 Mercury Tracer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Tracer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

62.25–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMercury
FreelanderModelTracer
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

14,4 s0–100 km/h—
159 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1950 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
112 HPPower111 HP
260 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank48 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption8,4 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4440 mm
1809 mmWidth1700 mm
1708 mmHeight1350 mm
1565 KgWeight1115 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Freelander and 2000 Mercury Tracer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Tracer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…