DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mercury Tracer vs 2000 Honda Civic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Tracer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeHonda
TracerModelCivic
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,8 s
185 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
111 HPPower105 HP
170 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4440 mmLength4425 mm
1700 mmWidth1695 mm
1350 mmHeight1410 mm
1115 KgWeight1265 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mercury Tracer and 2000 Honda Civic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Tracer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…