DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Mercury Sable vs 2000 Chrysler Voyager Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Voyager

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

59.25–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeChrysler
SableModelVoyager
1995Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h11,4 s
185 km/hTop speed175 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement3301 cc
141 HPPower158 HP
292 NmTorque275 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank76 lt
—Urban consumption17,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,3 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4882 mmLength4733 mm
1810 mmWidth1950 mm
1382 mmHeight1740 mm
1430 KgWeight1825 Kg
2693 mmWheelbase2878 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Mercury Sable and 2000 Chrysler Voyager approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Voyager leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…