DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport vs 1995 Mercury Sable Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Trans Sport

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

60.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeMercury
Trans SportModelSable
2000Model year1995
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
187 km/hTop speed185 km/h
3350 ccEngine displacement3797 cc
186 HPPower141 HP
270 NmTorque292 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank61 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption—
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/70 R15 HTyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5113 mmLength4882 mm
1850 mmWidth1810 mm
1730 mmHeight1382 mm
1740 KgWeight1430 Kg
3045 mmWheelbase2693 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport and 1995 Mercury Sable approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Trans Sport leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…