DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Pontiac Montana vs 1995 Mercury Sable Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Pontiac Montana

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

60.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PontiacMakeMercury
MontanaModelSable
2000Model year1995
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
190 km/hTop speed185 km/h
3350 ccEngine displacement3797 cc
186 HPPower141 HP
284 NmTorque292 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank61 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption—
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/70 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5100 mmLength4882 mm
1830 mmWidth1810 mm
1730 mmHeight1382 mm
1845 KgWeight1430 Kg
3070 mmWheelbase2693 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Pontiac Montana and 1995 Mercury Sable approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Pontiac Montana leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…