DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Mercury Sable vs 2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Trans Sport

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

59.25–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeChevrolet
SableModelTrans Sport
1995Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
185 km/hTop speed187 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement3350 cc
141 HPPower186 HP
292 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank95 lt
—Urban consumption13,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,9 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size215/70 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4882 mmLength5113 mm
1810 mmWidth1850 mm
1382 mmHeight1730 mm
1430 KgWeight1740 Kg
2693 mmWheelbase3045 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Mercury Sable and 2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Trans Sport leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…