DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mercury Sable vs 2000 Mercury Sable Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Sable

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

68.25–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeMercury
SableModelSable
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

190 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
157 HPPower157 HP
251 NmTorque251 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank68 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
13 ltExtra-urban consumption13 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/60 R16Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5070 mmLength5070 mm
1850 mmWidth1850 mm
1410 mmHeight1410 mm
1515 KgWeight1515 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mercury Sable and 2000 Mercury Sable approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…