DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mercury Mountaineer vs 2005 Mercury Mountaineer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Mountaineer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeMercury
MountaineerModelMountaineer
2003Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
235 HPPower242 HP
395 NmTorque379 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank85 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
13 ltExtra-urban consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/70 R15Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4790 mmLength4845 mm
1875 mmWidth1832 mm
1830 mmHeight1821 mm
—Weight1933 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2889 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mercury Mountaineer and 2005 Mercury Mountaineer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Mountaineer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…