DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 GMC Safari vs 2003 Mercury Mountaineer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Mountaineer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeMercury
SafariModelMountaineer
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats7
3Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,6 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
4300 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
190 HPPower235 HP
339 NmTorque395 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
102 ltFuel tank79 lt
—Urban consumption16,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size225/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4821 mmLength4790 mm
1968 mmWidth1875 mm
1900 mmHeight1830 mm
2083 KgWeight—
2824 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 GMC Safari and 2003 Mercury Mountaineer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Mountaineer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…