DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mercury Mountaineer vs 2002 GMC Sonoma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Mountaineer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeGMC
MountaineerModelSonoma
2003Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
7Seats5
5Doors2

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4300 cc
235 HPPower190 HP
395 NmTorque339 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank98 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption—
13 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/70 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4790 mmLength5215 mm
1875 mmWidth1725 mm
1830 mmHeight1610 mm
—Weight1706 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase3122 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mercury Mountaineer and 2002 GMC Sonoma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Mountaineer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…