DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mercury Mountaineer vs 1999 Ford Windstar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Mountaineer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeFord
MountaineerModelWindstar
2000Model year1999
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors4

Performance

170 km/hTop speed175 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement3797 cc
213 HPPower203 HP
326 NmTorque326 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank95 lt
18,2 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
11,1 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/70 R15Tyre size205/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4790 mmLength5125 mm
1875 mmWidth1915 mm
1830 mmHeight1790 mm
1760 KgWeight1690 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase3066 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mercury Mountaineer and 1999 Ford Windstar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Mountaineer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…