DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mercury Mountaineer vs 2000 Mercury Mountaineer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Mountaineer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeMercury
MountaineerModelMountaineer
1999Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

170 km/hTop speed170 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
213 HPPower213 HP
326 NmTorque326 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank79 lt
18,2 ltUrban consumption18,2 lt
11,1 ltExtra-urban consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/70 R15Tyre size225/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4790 mmLength4790 mm
1875 mmWidth1875 mm
1830 mmHeight1830 mm
1760 KgWeight1760 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mercury Mountaineer and 2000 Mercury Mountaineer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Mountaineer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…