DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Dodge Dakota vs 2000 Mercury Mountaineer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Dodge Dakota

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

74.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DodgeMakeMercury
DakotaModelMountaineer
1999Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
6Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
3701 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
214 HPPower213 HP
319 NmTorque326 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
91 ltFuel tank79 lt
—Urban consumption18,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size225/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5463 mmLength4790 mm
1818 mmWidth1875 mm
1699 mmHeight1830 mm
—Weight1760 Kg
3227 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Dodge Dakota and 2000 Mercury Mountaineer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Dodge Dakota leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…