DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mercury Mountaineer vs 1999 Dodge Dakota Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Dodge Dakota

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

74.5–74.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeDodge
MountaineerModelDakota
2000Model year1999
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats6
5Doors4

Performance

170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement3701 cc
213 HPPower214 HP
326 NmTorque319 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank91 lt
18,2 ltUrban consumption—
11,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/70 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4790 mmLength5463 mm
1875 mmWidth1818 mm
1830 mmHeight1699 mm
1760 KgWeight—
2830 mmWheelbase3227 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mercury Mountaineer and 1999 Dodge Dakota approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Dodge Dakota leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…